創作使用者贊助提醒/邀請函(核決權限表)
English version is listed below the
Traditional Chinese version
撰稿日:2024/02/26 上傳日：2024/03/03
尊敬的安侯企業管理股份有限公司 您好；
我是 Whatsyouridea1996 部落格作者黃曉蘋；這封信件是一份正式、公開的信件，也是部落格文章[因果] 供需平等; 因為引用，所以贊助、推廣/轉寄，或註明出處的附件。
首先聲明，本信函所提[原由事件]年代久遠，於2010-2011年發生，所指的[安侯企業管理股份有限公司]、[KPMG]或[KPMGTW]，現今狀態，在台灣法律上所屬的組織可能與原由事件公司不一致；本信函所指的[安侯企業管理股份有限公司]、[KPMG]或[KPMGTW]，是2010 -2011年之間，與台灣太古國際汽車集團(Taikoo Motors Group, a sub group of
Swire Group；以下將簡稱TMG)總部辦公室同位於台北101大樓內，雙方簽署企管顧問服務合約的服務提供者，(以下簡稱KPMGTW)，服務需求者則是TMG。該實質服務內容包含但不限於[管理制度設計與組織發展諮詢服務](以下簡稱企管顧問服務)，本人代表TMG擔任兩者互動窗口之一。在此先澄清，謝謝!
本信件的目的：
1. 期望了解KPMGTW使用本人創作或本部落格內容的狀態，並期待獲得回應。
2. 若KPMGTW已經使用本人創作作品，期望您依照使用用途及其價值，以供需價值平等的精神，贊助本部落格相當的價金。
3. 本信件內容相關議題，希望能夠平和地釐清，成為內容創作者與使用者之間互動行為的參考模式之一。
說明：
1. 本人在2010~2011年間服務於TMG時，正逢KPMGTW與TMG雙方合作履行上述企管顧問服務合約之際；當時由KPMGTW提供的制度設計參考文件，包含核決權限表(以下簡稱LOA)格式，其格式與本人2005~2009年服務於其他公司時職務上創作的LOA格式具有99.9%相似度。本人與TMG同事曾詢問貴公司該項LOA格式來源，但並未獲得回覆。
2. 由1，TMG當時集團組織涉及7個法律個體，因工作權責設計適當性的議題，曾向KPMGTW諮詢相關問題，惟貴公司自執行顧問服務人員至副總級以上(含KPMGTW人力資源服務部門，及本專案主持會計師)的回覆，其一致為[依公司規定]，與本人專業認知及TMG內部調整中的 [必須依各部門職能專長]為主軸發展，有很大的不同。
3. 2012~2023年之間，本人已知個人工作上的作品及本部落格的創作已在各企業之間流傳，間接得知KPMGTW部分曾提供客戶有關企業管理顧問服務資料內容與觀念，與本人創作作品極度相似，包括工作權責的概念，已與前述提供給TMG的服務內容有所不同。
描述至此，所提及的KPMGTW提供的資料，使用者感受到資料由KPMGTW所創建或擁有相關權利，並無創作者來源的訊息。
相信您會同意，企業管理方法與精神本為不斷吸取經驗並做必要調整，不同公司或個人，也非常有可能想法趨近一致；如前述，敬請KPMGTW確認，若曾使用本人職務上的產出或部落格內容的創作作品及觀點，敬請您贊助本部落格。
本人職務上作品及企業管理相關觀念，敬請點閱以下目錄及文章內容：
4. 本人認為KPMGTW想要為優質的客戶，例如TMG，提供[最精緻的]服務品質而不斷精進服務內容，因此，期待KPMGTW贊助金額新台幣33,333,333(稅後) * 企業規模類似TMG的全球客戶家數予本部落格。如同KPMGTW追求[最精緻的服務品質]，此提案贊助金額是使用本信函撰稿日2024/02/26善舉回報表內最高金額價值來定義的。
以上是贊助提醒與邀請。
感謝您的時間，期待您能夠在收到本人公開訊息後的兩週內回覆及贊助，您的回應內容，我均將予以尊重。
我也會將您的回應內容刊登或上傳於網路上。
贊助付款工具請詳此連結；謝謝!
歡迎與我聯絡；請指派專人，客服電子郵件信箱可能會被自動封鎖，謝謝!
黃曉蘋 敬上 2024/2/26
English version
Sponsorship reminder/invitation letter for users
and viewers of creative works(Level Of Authorization)
Draft Date: 2024/02/26 Date of
Publishing:2024/03/03
Dear respectable KPMG Advisory
Services Co., Ltd. ;
This is Emily H. P. Huang, the author of Whatsyouridea1996 blog, this is a formal letter and is also public accessible, more than that, it is the attachment of this article Equal give and take, because of utilizing, thus, to sponsor, promote/forward, or remark sources.
First of all, please allow me to state
that the [original incident] mentioned in this letter occurred long time ago,
it was in 2010-2011. The [KPMG Advisory Services Co., Ltd.], [KPMG]
or [KPMGTW] in this letter, its current status, the recognized legal
entity under Taiwan law may not be aligned with the involved company of the
original incident; [KPMG Advisory Services Co., Ltd.], [KPMG] or
[KPMGTW] ( below lists it as KPMGTW) and Taiwan's Taikoo Motors
Group ( a sub group of Swire Group, listed as TMG below) in this letter, it
indicates the legal entities recognized under Taiwan law and their headquarters
offices located in Taipei 101 Building in 2010-2011, and both parties
collaborated under a signed business management consulting service contract,
the service provider was KPMGTW and the requester was TMG, the
work scope included but not limited to [management polices design and work
organization development consulting services] (listed as BM consulting
service below ), I served as one of the contact window, a work representative
for TMG. I hope this clarifies in the beginning. Thank you.
Purposes of this letter:
1. I hope to know the status of KPMGTW
using my creations or the content of this blog, and look forward to receiving
your response.
2. If KPMGTW has used my works, I
hope you will sponsor to this blog and the corresponding amount is based on the
purpose of your use and its value and follow the work spirit of value
equality between supply and demand.
3. I hope could peacefully
clarify related issues mentioned in this letter and make this become one of the
reference work models of interactions between content creators and the users.
Description:
1. In 2010~2011 when I worked for TMG,
it was at the timing KPMGTW and TMG were co-working under the
contract of above mentioned BM consulting service; the documents KPMGTW
provided for our policies development reference included the format
of Level Of Authorization(listed as LOA below), there was 99.9%
similarities to my work outcome in the company I worked for in 2005~2009. My TMG
colleagues and I have asked for your LOA format sources, however, we didn’t get
any feedback from you.
2. Due to 1, and because TMG
contained 7 legal entities, it caused the appropriateness of work roles and
responsibilities development issues, we consulted to KPMGTW for
related advices, however, including the direct service provider consultants to
VP and above (Human Resource Service Department and this Project In Charge
Partner of KPMGTW) replied the same as [it relies on the company’s definition], that was quite different
from my professional understanding of it and TMG’s major improvement
work objectives of our adjustment [needs to follow work professions of all
single departments].
3. In 2012~2023, I’ve already known my
work results and contents of this blog have been shared among companies, and I
also indirectly know the some of the BM consulting service material and point
of views KPMGTW provided for clients were extremely similar to my works,
it included the concepts of work roles and responsibilities that was
different from those provided for TMG before.
All the description until now, the
mentioned materials KPMGTW provided, users feel they were created by KPMGTW
or the ownership or rights belongs to it, there was no original creators’ information.
I believe you would agree that business
management methodologies and work spirit needs to continuously gain related
work experience and do required adjustment, there is great possibility
different companies or individuals have similar mindset of it; as this
explanation, please KPMGTW make confirmation and if you internally have
used or adopted my work outcome or contents of this blog, please sponsor to
this blog.
Regarding my work outcome and
business management point of views, please click to view below categories and
articles listed in it:
4. I believe, KPMGTW keeps making
efforts to reinforce professional service in order to provide excellent quality
clients like TMG with the [finest] service quality, accordingly, I hope
the amount KPMGTW would like to sponsor to this blog would reach TWD33,333,333(after
tax) * globally, the number of clients of business size
similar to TMG’s. To make alignment with [KPMGTW]’s [finest service
quality spirit], this amount is the highest number in Return for Kindness Chart
on date 2024/02/26 of this letter.
Above is the sponsoring reminder and
invitation.
I thank you for your spending time in
reading this, and I also look forward to receiving your feedback and your
sponsoring within 2 weeks after you receive this public message. I will respect
your response.
I’ll also publish or upload your
feedback on internet.
Payment tool foryour sponsoring please click this link; thank you!
Emily H. P. Huang 2024/2/26
